Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790554›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2024

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Impact of a Therapy Dog Intervention on Loneliness in Hospitalized Older Adults.

Nancy R Gee, Lisa Townsend, Erika Friedmann, Sandra B Barker, Megan K Mueller

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05089201 (A Pilot Study to Examine the Impact of a Therapy Dog Intervention on Loneliness and Related Health Outcomes in Vulnerable Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05089201 nacompletednot on this map

A Pilot Study to Examine the Impact of a Therapy Dog Intervention on Loneliness and Related Health Outcomes in Vulnerable Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRan2021 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsLoneliness, Depression, Anxiety, Quality of LifeArmsAnimal-assisted interaction, Conversational control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nancy R GeeCenter for Human-Animal Interaction, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2890-9884
Lisa TownsendCenter for Human-Animal Interaction, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3301-7848
Erika FriedmannDepartment of Organizational Systems and Adult Health, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-0449
Sandra B BarkerCenter for Human-Animal Interaction, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9518-0117
Megan K MuellerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Center for Animals and Public Policy, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-0894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Loneliness is linked to significant health threats and is potentially more dangerous than obesity; it affects as many as 29% of noninstitutionalized older adults. Loneliness is exacerbated for those who require inpatient rehabilitation, are displaced from their social networks, spend little time receiving therapy, and are physically inactive and socially isolated. Emerging evidence suggests that companion animals provide a number of health and well-being benefits and that interacting with a trained therapy dog may reduce loneliness. Research Design and Methods: Older adult (59+ years) medical inpatients ( Results: Changes in the UCLA-SF [ Discussion and Implications: These results indicate that AAI was effective for reducing loneliness in hospitalized older adults. Human handler only visits did not result in similar findings, indicating that there is something unique and beneficial about the presence of the dog. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05089201.

Indexed as

Animal-assisted interventionHealthWell-being

Identifiers

PMID39790554
PMCPMC11714157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.