Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790528›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2023

Task Sharing in Global Cardiac Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Laura DiChiacchio, Alejandra Castro-Varela, Dominique Vervoort, Amy G Fiedler

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura DiChiacchioDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Alejandra Castro-VarelaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Dominique VervoortDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amy G FiedlerDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Access to cardiac surgical services is limited in low- and middle-income countries. The shortage of cardiac surgical care providers is a major contributor to this limited access to lifesaving care. Task shifting and task sharing allow nonspecialists to perform roles typically reserved for specialists such as cardiothoracic surgeons, cardiac anesthesiologists, and other health care workers with specific training in cardiac surgical care. Task sharing has increased access to care without compromising outcomes in related surgical fields, such as general surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurologic surgery, and obstetrics and gynecologic surgery. Methods: A scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews using the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, World Health Organization Global Index Medicus, and Web of Science. The search was constructed to identify articles specifically addressing task sharing in cardiac surgical care. Results: Four relevant articles were identified. Only 1 focused on task sharing specifically by cardiac surgeons; this was a case study of 2 surgeons at a single hospital who used task sharing with junior surgeons to varying degrees. Two studies discussed task sharing as part of a team-based approach to the management of rheumatic heart disease; 1 study discussed cost-effectiveness in the delivery of cardiac surgical care and included task sharing as 1 approach to cost reduction. Conclusions: There is a paucity of literature describing the applications and outcomes of task sharing in cardiac surgery in variable-resource contexts. Here, we present a scoping review summarizing the literature on experiences with task sharing for cardiac surgical care.

Identifiers

PMID39790528
PMCPMC11708438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.