ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2024
Geographic Variation in the Utilization of Services Surrounding Lung Cancer Resection.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As value-based care models continue to gain emphasis, along with the need for improved profiling across the continuum of lung cancer care, a better understanding of geographic variation in utilization of services surrounding episodes of care is needed. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing lung cancer resection from 2017 to 2019, we examined geographic variation in utilization of services surrounding episodes of lung cancer resection. We utilized hierarchical logistic regression models to determine risk-adjusted utilization of services. This study utilized inpatient and ambulatory databases across 4 states: New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Maryland. All patients undergoing lung cancer resection were included. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted utilization of services. Results: Mean risk-adjusted utilization of ambulatory procedures across all hospital referral regions (HRRs) was 34.1% (95% CI 30.7%-37.6%), while the individual HRR utilization varied from 10.9% to 54.9% ( Conclusions: Overall, we observed that utilization of ambulatory services varied significantly across HRRs, while inpatient utilization did not demonstrate significant variation. Given these findings, there may be geographic drivers of variation in the utilization of services surrounding lung cancer resection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.