Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790417›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2024

Secondary Esophageal Cancer After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: An Institutional Case Series.

Anupama Singh, Miles McAllister, Ashley L Deeb, Sue X Wang, Kristen Rizza, Vincent T Ho, Harvey Mamon, Peter C Enzinger, Michael T Jaklitsch, Jon O Wee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anupama SinghDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Miles McAllisterDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ashley L DeebDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sue X WangDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kristen RizzaDivision of Cellular Therapies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Vincent T HoDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvey MamonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Peter C EnzingerDivision of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael T JaklitschDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jon O WeeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Development of secondary esophageal cancer after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been described; however, there is little consensus on treatment and surveillance for these patients. The objective of this study was to describe our experience treating patients with secondary esophageal cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data was performed to identify patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from 1997 to 2012 and in whom esophageal cancer developed later. Results: A total of 5066 patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and esophageal cancer developed in 11 (0.2%) of these patients. The median time to diagnosis of esophageal cancer after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was 11 years (interquartile range, 8.5 to 14 years). Four patients received a diagnosis of stage III or IV disease. Seven patients underwent esophagectomy, 6 patients after neoadjuvant treatment. Three patients experienced adverse events postoperatively, all grades II and IIIa. Two surgical patients died of distant recurrence 2 years and 3 years, respectively, after their esophageal cancer diagnosis. The other 5 surgical patients have not experienced recurrence of their esophageal cancer. Conclusions: For patients with secondary esophageal cancer, esophagectomy after neoadjuvant treatment has acceptable morbidity and may be a viable option for this cohort.

Identifiers

PMID39790417
PMCPMC11708689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.