ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2024
Intraoperative Features Improve Model Risk Predictions After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurse-Led Large Language Model Chatbot for Predicting and Preventing Complications After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Advancing risk prediction in intracranial aneurysm clipping.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Intraoperative physiologic parameters could offer predictive utility in evaluating risk of adverse postoperative events yet are not included in current standard risk models. This study examined whether the inclusion of continuous intraoperative data improved machine learning model predictions for multiple outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting, including 30-day mortality, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, and combined morbidity and mortality (MM). Methods: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database features and risk scores were combined with retrospectively gathered continuous intraoperative data from patients. Risk models were developed for each outcome by training a logistic regression classifier on intraoperative data using 5-fold cross-validation. STS risk scores were included as offset terms in the models. Results: Compared with the STS Risk Calculator, models developed using a combination of the intraoperative features and the STS preoperative risk score had improved mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prolonged ventilation (0.750 [95% CI, 0.690-0.809] vs 0.800 [95% CI, 0.750-0.851]) and MM (0.695 [95% CI, 0.644-0.746] vs 0.724 [95% CI, 0.673-0.775]). Additionally, models developed using intraoperative features had improved calibration, measured with Brier score, for prolonged ventilation (0.060 [95% CI, 0.050-0.070] vs 0.055 [95% CI, 0.045-0.065]) and MM (0.092 [95% CI, 0.081-0.103] vs 0.087 [95% CI, 0.075-0.098]). Conclusions: The inclusion of time series intraoperative data in risk models may improve early postoperative care by identifying patients who require closer monitoring postoperatively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.