Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790416›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2024

Intraoperative Features Improve Model Risk Predictions After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Willa Potosnak, Keith A Dufendach, Chirag Nagpal, David J Kaczorowski, Pyongsoo Yoon, Johannes Bonatti, James K Miller, Artur W Dubrawski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advancing risk prediction in intracranial aneurysm clipping.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Willa PotosnakAuton Lab, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Keith A DufendachAuton Lab, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Chirag NagpalAuton Lab, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David J KaczorowskiDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Pyongsoo YoonDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Johannes BonattiDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
James K MillerAuton Lab, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Artur W DubrawskiAuton Lab, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Biomedical Informatics Tools for Applied Perioperative PhysiologyR01EB029751 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CANNESSON, MAXIME · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative physiologic parameters could offer predictive utility in evaluating risk of adverse postoperative events yet are not included in current standard risk models. This study examined whether the inclusion of continuous intraoperative data improved machine learning model predictions for multiple outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting, including 30-day mortality, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, and combined morbidity and mortality (MM). Methods: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database features and risk scores were combined with retrospectively gathered continuous intraoperative data from patients. Risk models were developed for each outcome by training a logistic regression classifier on intraoperative data using 5-fold cross-validation. STS risk scores were included as offset terms in the models. Results: Compared with the STS Risk Calculator, models developed using a combination of the intraoperative features and the STS preoperative risk score had improved mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for prolonged ventilation (0.750 [95% CI, 0.690-0.809] vs 0.800 [95% CI, 0.750-0.851]) and MM (0.695 [95% CI, 0.644-0.746] vs 0.724 [95% CI, 0.673-0.775]). Additionally, models developed using intraoperative features had improved calibration, measured with Brier score, for prolonged ventilation (0.060 [95% CI, 0.050-0.070] vs 0.055 [95% CI, 0.045-0.065]) and MM (0.092 [95% CI, 0.081-0.103] vs 0.087 [95% CI, 0.075-0.098]). Conclusions: The inclusion of time series intraoperative data in risk models may improve early postoperative care by identifying patients who require closer monitoring postoperatively.

Identifiers

PMID39790416
PMCPMC11708469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.