ArticleToxicology research2025
The performance of ejection fraction as a predictor of mortality and morbidity in acute aluminium phosphide poisoning.
Article in Toxicology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed ischemic stroke ten days after aluminum phosphide ingestion in a previously healthy 21-year-old Ethiopian woman: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Role of Central Venous Pressure and Mean Arterial Pressure to Central Venous Pressure Ratio in Assessing Poisoning Severity and Poor Outcomes in Intensive Care Unit-Admitted Acute Aluminum Phosphide-Poisoned Patients.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aluminium phosphide poison become an alarming, well-known, effective suicidal poison with a high mortality rate. There is a need for a simple tool that can triage patients with bad prognosis. The study aimed to assess the accuracy of ejection fraction as a predictor of mortality and morbidity in acute aluminium phosphide toxicity cases. The study involved 70 cases of acutely aluminium phosphide-poisoned patients in our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. The study found that 54.3% of the cases were males and 45.7% were females, with a mean age of 22.4 ± 11.8 years old. The oral route was the route of administration of all cases, and the intention of poisoning was intentional in 84.3% of cases. Regarding the outcome of patients, 62.9% of the cases recovered, and 37.1% died. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve found that the ejection fraction below 37.5% had an accuracy rate of 96.8% with excellent discrimination for mortality, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93.2%, positive predictive value of 89.6%, and negative predictive value of 100%. The ejection fraction below 52.5% had an accuracy rate of 89% with good discrimination for complications, sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 96.8%, positive predictive value of 90.9%, and negative predictive value of 93.7%. So, the ejection fraction plays an essential tool in predicting mortality and complications in acute aluminium phosphide toxicity and should be assessed on every patient in the first 24 h of admission to facilitate the triage of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.