Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790343›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2024

A comparison of demographic profiles, clinical profile, course, and outcome of Bipolar I Disorder and Bipolar II Disorder: Findings from the Bipolar Disorder Course and Outcome study from India (BiD-CoIN study).

Sandeep Grover, Ajit Avasthi, Rahul Chakravarty, Amitava Dan, Kaustav Chakraborty, Rajarishi Neogi, Avinash Desouza, Omkar Nayak, Samir Kumar Praharaj, Vikas Menon and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sandeep GroverDepartment of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ajit AvasthiDepartment of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rahul ChakravartyDepartment of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Amitava DanDepartment of Psychiatry, Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
Kaustav ChakrabortyDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and J.N.M. Hospital WBUHS, Kalyani, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Rajarishi NeogiDepartment of Psychiatry, R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Avinash DesouzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital (SION Hospital), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Omkar NayakDepartment of Psychiatry, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital (SION Hospital), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Samir Kumar PraharajDepartment of Psychiatry, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Vikas MenonDepartment of Psychiatry, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Raman DeepDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Manish BathlaDepartment of Psychiatry, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Alka A SubramanyamDepartment of Psychiatry, Topiwala National Medical College (Nair Hospital), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Naresh NebhinaniDepartment of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Prosenjit GhoshDepartment of Psychiatry, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Silchar, Assam, India.
Bhavesh LakdawalaDepartment of Psychiatry, Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation Medical Education Trust Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Ranjan BhattacharyaDepartment of Psychiatry, Murshidabad Medical College and Hospital, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is lack of data on bipolar disorder (BD) type II from India. Aim: To compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with BD-I and BD-II using the data of the Bipolar Disorder Course and Outcome study from India (BiD-CoIN study). Methodology: Using the data of the BiD-CoIN study, patients with BD-I and BD-II were compared for demographic and clinical variables. Results: Out of the 773 patients, 59 (7.63%) participants had BD-II. Compared to BD-I, patients with BD-II had a higher income; were more often unemployed or housewives; had a higher mean number of episodes per year of illness, higher severity of depressive episodes, higher depressive affective morbidity, and a higher number of hypomanic episodes (in the lifetime, and number of episodes per year of illness); received lower doses of lithium and a lower number of medications; and had lower prevalence of alcohol dependence, higher prevalence of seasonality, a high proportion of them sought faith healing treatment, and a higher proportion of them have predominant depressive polarity. Conclusions: Patients with BD-I and BD-II differ from each other on certain demographic and clinical variables. The difference in the clinical variables suggests that the patients with BD-II may require different treatment approaches for management.

Indexed as

Bipolar disordercourseoutcomesubtypes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.