ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2024
Patients Struggle With Severe Symptoms Even After Surviving Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcome after perioperative chemotherapy and surgery for gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- ChatGPT vs Expert-Guided Care Pathways for Postesophagectomy Symptom Management.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This prospective study was conducted to determine postesophagectomy symptom severity of esophageal cancer survivors with use of the Upper Digestive Disease (UDD) questionnaire. Methods: A prospective trial included adult esophagectomy patients diagnosed with primary esophageal carcinoma at a single institution from 2000 to 2011. Those who remained alive in 2015 to 2021 were enrolled. Comparison was made between sequential questionnaires. Results: From a prospective registry of 895 patients with esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, 297 (33%) long-term survivors were identified. Of those, 93 (31%) had recent contact data and 66 (71%) consented and completed the UDD questionnaire. Most participants, 77% (51), were men with a mean age of 57 (±7) years. The mean time from esophagectomy was 12 (8-20) years. The 66 enrolled patients completed 127 UDD questionnaires. A total of 27 (41%) completed at least 2 questionnaires. Poor performance was recorded in the 5 domains as follows: reflux, 19 patients (29%); pain, 3 patients (5%); dysphagia, 0 patients; gastrointestinal dumping, 31 patients (47%); and generalized dumping, 17 patients (26%). Between the first and second questionnaires, dysphagia had the most noticeable improvement in domain score (23/27 [85%]), and reflux had the most regression in domain score (7/27 [26%]). Conclusions: Patient-reported outcome data are an integral part of esophageal cancer survivorship care. Having a standardized tool that would enhance research and standardize care pathway symptom management is needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.