Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790213›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Wounds-A Prospective, Monocentric Clinical Trial to Examine the Effect of Shock Waves on Wound Healing.

Kristina Landscheidt, Ahmed Alabdulmohsen, Markus Hübscher, Benjamin Geber, Jochen-Frederick Hernekamp, Ole Goertz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristina LandscheidtDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery Martin-Luther Hospital (Martin-Luther Krankenhaus) Berlin Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-8175
Ahmed AlabdulmohsenDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery Martin-Luther Hospital (Martin-Luther Krankenhaus) Berlin Germany.
Markus HübscherSTORZ Medical AG Tägerwilen Switzerland.
Benjamin GeberDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery Martin-Luther Hospital (Martin-Luther Krankenhaus) Berlin Germany.
Jochen-Frederick HernekampDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery Martin-Luther Hospital (Martin-Luther Krankenhaus) Berlin Germany.
Ole GoertzDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery Martin-Luther Hospital (Martin-Luther Krankenhaus) Berlin Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of our prospective blinded clinical study was to examine a possible improvement and acceleration of epithelialization by treatment with low-energy extracorporeal shock waves on skin graft donor and recipient sites in patients with chronic wounds. In addition, several secondary parameters were investigated to evaluate the compatibility of the therapeutic method, its influence on infection occurrence and bacterial colonization. Materials and Methods: A total of 35 patients were included in the study. Of these, 25 participants were assigned to the verum-placebo group and 10 to the sham treatment group. The study of the sham control group was done to exclude a possible "remote effect" of the placebo area. Depending on the group, the wound areas were treated with low-frequency shock waves, placebo, or sham. The examinations were performed immediately on Day 0 after surgical treatment and on Days 5, 7, 9, and 12 after surgery. To record long-term results, an additional evaluation of the wound situation was performed on Day 90. Results: Epithelialization was statistically significantly accelerated by shock wave application at both skin graft recipient sites and donor sites (0.86 vs. 0.92, Conclusion: A repeated application of ESWT followed by standardized wound care was shown to significantly accelerate the time to re-epithelialization at the skin graft donor and recipient site compared with re-epithelialization time in patients of the sham/placebo group.

Indexed as

acute woundschronic woundsextracorporeal shock wavessplit skin graftwound healing

Identifiers

PMID39790213
PMCPMC11711216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.