ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2024
Evaluation of myocardial perfusion imaging techniques and artificial intelligence (AI) tools in coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis through multi-criteria decision-making method.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of a comprehensive value assessment framework for renal denervation therapy: a decision-support tool for Chinese hospital management.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Hybrid PET/CT and PET/MR in Coronary Artery Disease: An Update for Clinicians, with Insights into AI-Guided Integration.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging: Novel Advances, Emerging Techniques, and Recent Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continue to be the world's greatest cause of death. To evaluate heart function and diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has become essential. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been incorporated into diagnostic methods such as MPI to improve patient outcomes in recent years. This study aims to employ a novel approach to examine how parameters/criteria and performance metrics affect the prioritization of selected MPI techniques and AI tools in CAD diagnosis. Identifying the most effective method in these two interconnected areas will increase the CAD diagnosis rate. Methods: The study includes an in-depth investigation of popular convolutional neural network (CNN) models, including InceptionV3, VGG16, ResNet50, and DenseNet121, in addition to widely used machine learning (ML) models, including random forests (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and Naïve Bayes (NB). In addition, it includes the evaluation of nuclear MPI techniques, including positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), with the non-nuclear MPI technique of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Various performance metrics were used to evaluate AI tools. They are F1-score, recall, specificity, precision, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). For MPI techniques, the evaluation criteria include specificity, sensitivity, radiation dose, cost of scan, and study duration. The analysis was evaluated and compared using the fuzzy-based preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE), the multi-criteria decision-making method (MDCM). Results: According to the study's findings, considering selected performance metrics or criteria, RF is the most efficient AI tool for SPECT MPI in the diagnosis of CAD with a net flow ( Conclusions: It was concluded that CMR outperformed the nuclear MPI techniques. SPECT, as the least advantageous technique, remained below average on other criteria except for the cost of the scan. Integrating the RF algorithm, which stands out as the most effective AI tool in diagnosing CAD, with SPECT MPI may contribute to SPECT becoming a superior alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.