ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2024
Evaluating Safety of Telehealth for Initial Surgical Evaluation of General Thoracic Patients.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of telehealth has grown exponentially since the COVID-19 pandemic. The safety of an initial telehealth preoperative evaluation for patients undergoing general thoracic procedures is unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent a general thoracic surgical procedure at our academic tertiary care institution from January 2021 to December 2022. We determined that visits were performed through telehealth or an in-person visit and linked to our institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database to abstract outcomes. Our outcomes of interest included complications, readmissions, intraoperative conversions, and intensive care unit admissions. Hierarchical multivariate logistic regression was used and clustered within procedure type. Results: Of 1348 patients who underwent a procedure in our institution, 469 (34.8%) patients had an initial telehealth preoperative evaluation. We analyzed outcomes for 757 patients who underwent a major thoracic procedure. Patients who had an in-person visit tended to be older with worse functional status. After multivariable adjustment, an initial telehealth evaluation was associated with a lower adjusted complication rate (31.6% vs 40.4%; odds ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.46-0.88]; Conclusions: This preliminary study of the use of telehealth for preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing general thoracic procedures suggests that it is a safe and feasible alternative to an in-person evaluation. Care must be taken to ensure that this pandemic-induced trend continues to improve patient access to surgical care without worsening or creating new disparities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.