Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39790145›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2024

Willingness for Lung Cancer Screening: Disparities Among Informed, Screening-Eligible Individuals.

Hollis Hutchings, Olivia Aspiras, Anurag Dawadi, Anqi Wang, Laila Poisson, Todd Lucas, Ikenna Okereke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Understanding lung cancer screening motivation: cognitive, affective, and thought-based predictors in a UK screening-eligible sample.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Addressing Lung Cancer Screening Disparities: More Work To Be Done.Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2024
    Article
  5. Disparities in Screening: Can Education Address Imbalance?Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hollis HutchingsDepartment of Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Olivia AspirasCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, Michigan State University, Flint, Michigan.
Anurag DawadiCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, Michigan State University, Flint, Michigan.
Anqi WangDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Laila PoissonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Todd LucasCharles Stewart Mott Department of Public Health, Michigan State University, Flint, Michigan.
Ikenna OkerekeDepartment of Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death. Although lung cancer screening has been shown to reduce mortality, only a small fraction of eligible people receive screening. This study briefly educated screening-eligible individuals about lung cancer risk, prevention, and screening recommendations. We then evaluated race and gender as predictors of willingness to be screened once participants were educated. Methods: An online lung cancer screening learning module was created and distributed to convenience samples of screening-eligible White Americans (n = 173) and Black Americans (n = 52) between November 2022 and February 2023. Participants viewed short modules about lung cancer risks and screening. Thereafter, participants rated their willingness to consider future screening using theory of planned behavior measurement frameworks (attitudes, norms, perceived control, and intentions to screen), with higher scores indicating greater willingness. Participant demographics were recorded. Results: Black Americans reported higher perceived control over obtaining screening than White Americans ( Conclusions: Once informed about lung cancer risks, prevention, and screening recommendations, Black Americans may be as willing as White Americans to undergo screening, highlighting potential causal factors other than willingness for existing racial disparities in lung cancer screening uptake. Gender differences in willingness highlight a potential need for gender-targeted outreach and communication.

Identifiers

PMID39790145
PMCPMC11708339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.