Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789939›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025

Association of Favorable Cerebrospinal Fluid Markers With Reversion of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Parkinson's Disease.

Cameron A Ryczek, Rhiannon Rivas, Lea Hemphill, Zackary Zanotelli, Nicholas Renteria, Khashayar Dashtipour, Jacob D Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cameron A RyczekDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino (Ryczek, Rivas, Hemphill, Zanotelli, Renteria, Jones); Department of Neurology, Division of Movement Disorders, Loma Linda University Health System, Loma Linda, Calif. (Dashtipour); Center on Aging, California State University, San Bernardino (Jones).
Rhiannon RivasDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino (Ryczek, Rivas, Hemphill, Zanotelli, Renteria, Jones); Department of Neurology, Division of Movement Disorders, Loma Linda University Health System, Loma Linda, Calif. (Dashtipour); Center on Aging, California State University, San Bernardino (Jones).
Lea HemphillDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino (Ryczek, Rivas, Hemphill, Zanotelli, Renteria, Jones); Department of Neurology, Division of Movement Disorders, Loma Linda University Health System, Loma Linda, Calif. (Dashtipour); Center on Aging, California State University, San Bernardino (Jones).
Zackary ZanotelliDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino (Ryczek, Rivas, Hemphill, Zanotelli, Renteria, Jones); Department of Neurology, Division of Movement Disorders, Loma Linda University Health System, Loma Linda, Calif. (Dashtipour); Center on Aging, California State University, San Bernardino (Jones).
Nicholas RenteriaDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino (Ryczek, Rivas, Hemphill, Zanotelli, Renteria, Jones); Department of Neurology, Division of Movement Disorders, Loma Linda University Health System, Loma Linda, Calif. (Dashtipour); Center on Aging, California State University, San Bernardino (Jones).
Khashayar DashtipourDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino (Ryczek, Rivas, Hemphill, Zanotelli, Renteria, Jones); Department of Neurology, Division of Movement Disorders, Loma Linda University Health System, Loma Linda, Calif. (Dashtipour); Center on Aging, California State University, San Bernardino (Jones).
Jacob D JonesDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino (Ryczek, Rivas, Hemphill, Zanotelli, Renteria, Jones); Department of Neurology, Division of Movement Disorders, Loma Linda University Health System, Loma Linda, Calif. (Dashtipour); Center on Aging, California State University, San Bernardino (Jones).

Funding

U-RISE at CSUSBT34GM136467 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV SAN BERNARDINO · PI Leslie Renee Amodeo, Jacob D Jones · 2020 to 2026
$2.6M
Microbiome Composition and Function Contributes to Cognitive Impairment and Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s DiseaseSC3NS124906 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV SAN BERNARDINO · PI JONES, JACOB D · 2021 to 2024
$438k
NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM136467NINDS NIH HHS SC3 NS124906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCognitive impairment is a common nonmotor symptom among individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). Although cognitive impairment generally develops progressively, individuals with PD-associated mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) may revert to being cognitively normal (CN), which is referred to as PD-MCI reversion. Previous studies are inconsistent in whether PD-MCI reverters are at greater risk for PD-MCI recurrence relative to CN individuals. Even less is known about how PD-MCI reverters compare with CN individuals or PD-MCI nonreverters in terms of neurodegenerative biomarkers. The authors examined group differences (CN, PD-MCI reversion, and PD-MCI nonreversion) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of Alzheimer's disease (AD), including amyloid beta, tau (total [t-tau] and phosphorylated [p-tau]), and alpha-synuclein.

methodsData from the longitudinal international multisite Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative were used. Participants were newly diagnosed as having PD (N=430) and completed a battery of neurocognitive assessments at baseline and annual follow-ups for up to 5 years. Participants were classified as CN, PD-MCI reverters, or PD-MCI nonreverters on the basis of the first two neurocognitive assessments.

resultsThe PD-MCI nonreversion group had greater p-tau:amyloid beta and t-tau:amyloid beta ratios relative to the PD-MCI reversion group. The CN and PD-MCI reversion groups did not significantly differ in any of the CSF markers.

conclusionsPD-MCI reverters may have a more favorable trajectory in terms of AD pathology relative to PD-MCI nonreverters. Future studies are needed to verify whether PD-MCI reversion may represent an intermediate prognostic group between CN individuals and those with MCI nonreversion.

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinAmyloid beta-PeptidesCognitive DysfunctionParkinson Diseasetau ProteinsAgedBiomarkersDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological Testsalpha-SynucleinAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseCerebrospinal Fluid MarkersCognitive DisordersMild Cognitive ImpairmentParkinson’s Disease

Identifiers

PMID39789939
PMCPMC12014151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.