Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789902›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2025

Domain-Specific Prediction of Clinical Progression in Parkinson's Disease Using the Mosaic Approach.

Marlene Tahedl, Ulrich Bogdahn, Bernadette Wimmer, Dennis M Hedderich, Jan S Kirschke, Claus Zimmer, Benedikt Wiestler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marlene TahedlDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1762-4824
Ulrich BogdahnDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Bernadette WimmerDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dennis M HedderichDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-5593
Jan S KirschkeDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claus ZimmerDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Benedikt WiestlerDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDue to the highly individualized clinical manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD), personalized patient care may require domain-specific assessment of neurological disability. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies has proposed that heterogenous clinical manifestation corresponds to heterogeneous cortical disease burden, suggesting customized, high-resolution assessment of cortical pathology as a candidate biomarker for domain-specific assessment.

methodHerein, we investigate the potential of the recently proposed Mosaic Approach (MAP), a normative framework for quantifying individual cortical disease burden with respect to a population-representative cohort, in predicting domain-specific clinical progression. Using MRI and clinical data from 135 recently diagnosed PD patients from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative, we first defined an extremity-specific motor score. We then identified cortical regions corresponding to "extremity functions" and restricted MAP, respectively, and contrasted the explanatory power of the extremity-specific MAP to unrestricted MAP. As control conditions, domain-related but less specific general motor function and nondomain-specific cognitive scores were considered. We also tested the predictive power of the restricted MAP in predicting disease progression over 1 and 3 years using support vector machines. The restricted, extremity-specific MAP yielded higher explanatory power for extremity-specific motor function at baseline as opposed to the unrestricted, whole-brain MAP. On the contrary, for general motor function, the unrestricted, whole-brain MAP yielded higher power. FINDING: No associations were found for cognitive function. The extremity-specific MAP predicted extremity-specific motor progression over 1 and 3 years above chance level. The MAP framework allows for domain-specific prediction of customized PD disease progression, which can inform machine learning, thereby contributing to personalized PD patient care.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionMagnetic Resonance ImagingParkinson DiseaseAgedCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSupport Vector Machinecortical thicknessmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingParkinson's diseasepersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID39789902
PMCPMC11726648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.