Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789896›Full record

SynthesisNursing & health sciences2025

Barriers and Enablers of Primary Healthcare Professionals in Health Research Engagement: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.

Mark Matheson, Ian W Skinner, Arianne Vehagen, Sean Mc Auliffe, Peter Malliaras

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances, Overuse, and Shared Decision-Making in Abdominal Wall Surgery.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark MathesonFaculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6316-8163
Ian W SkinnerSchool of Allied Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, Port Macquarie Campuses, Charles Sturt University, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3288-0519
Arianne VehagenGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-0128
Sean Mc AuliffeSchool of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8716-5005
Peter MalliarasFaculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health professional engagement ensures relevant, clinically focused research that informs evidence-based care. Research shows health professionals may not engage optimally in research. Understanding barriers and enablers influencing participation is necessary to enhance engagement. This systematic review explores these factors among primary healthcare professionals. We searched peer-reviewed studies using CINAHL, Medline, and SCOPUS in February 2023, updated in June 2024. The review followed PRISMA and the ENTREQ checklist. Studies included those published in English, reporting factors influencing engagement among primary healthcare professionals. Qualitative data were extracted and thematically synthesized. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Nineteen studies were included. Enablers include individual positive attitudes and a scholarly environment. Barriers include negative attitudes, an unconducive environment, and system constraints. Primary health professionals view research engagement positively, recognizing its potential to enhance health outcomes, professional growth, and business performance. Balancing clinical responsibilities, workload and research is challenging. Targeted strategies promoting partnerships and stakeholder involvement can foster a scholarly environment and empower research engagement.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelQualitative ResearchAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansPrimary Health CareWork Engagementhealth professionalhealth researchprimary healthcaresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39789896
PMCPMC11718354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.