ArticleTransfusion2025
Dissociation of IgM antibodies from red blood cells using ethylenediamine tetraacetate/glycine acid or chloroquine diphosphate.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEthylenediamine tetraacetate/glycine acid (EGA) and chloroquine diphosphate (CDP) are used in transfusion testing to dissociate IgG antibodies from red blood cells (RBCs). However, the ability of these reagents to dissociate IgM antibodies sensitized to RBCs has not been comprehensively elucidated. We investigated whether EGA and CDP could dissociate cold-reactive antibodies from RBCs and their effect on RBCs after dissociation treatment. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsCold-reactive antibody-sensitized RBC samples were prepared by mixing group A RBCs and group B plasma and treated with EGA, CDP, and dithiothreitol (DTT). Before and after the dissociation treatment, changes in the agglutination of these RBCs were assessed using the test tube method. Flow cytometric analysis was used to confirm the nature of antibodies bound to RBCs. Additionally, RBC morphology was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. This study utilized off-label use of EGA and CDP.
resultsFlow cytometric analysis showed that antibodies sensitized to RBCs were mainly IgM antibodies. After antibody dissociation, agglutination disappeared in the EGA-treated samples to the same degree as in the DTT-treated samples. However, IgM antibodies remained in the CDP-treated samples. Regarding RBC morphology, RBC surface appeared coarser in both EGA- and CDP-treated samples, and RBC area was significantly smaller in the CDP-treated samples than in the EGA-treated samples. DISCUSSION: EGA could dissociate cold-reactive antibodies, whereas CDP had a higher residual antibody content. This difference in dissociation ability appears to correlate with the antibody pH of the dissociation reagent. EGA treatment may be useful in cases of sensitization by high-titer cold-reactive antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.