ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
A machine learning model accurately identifies glycogen storage disease Ia patients based on plasma acylcarnitine profiles.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A newborn with glycogen storage disease type Ib presenting with hypoglycemia and evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Multimodal AI for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Historical Perspectives, Classification and Diagnostic Approaches of Inborn Errors of Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Metabolites · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlycogen storage disease (GSD) Ia is an ultra-rare inherited disorder of carbohydrate metabolism. Patients often present in the first months of life with fasting hypoketotic hypoglycemia and hepatomegaly. The diagnosis of GSD Ia relies on a combination of different biomarkers, mostly routine clinical chemical markers and subsequent genetic confirmation. However, a specific and reliable biomarker is lacking. As GSD Ia patients demonstrate altered lipid metabolism and mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, we built a machine learning model to identify GSD Ia patients based on plasma acylcarnitine profiles.
methodsWe collected plasma acylcarnitine profiles from 3958 patients, of whom 31 have GSD Ia. Synthetic samples were generated to address the problem of class imbalance in the dataset. We built several machine learning models based on gradient-boosted trees. Our approach included hyperparameter tuning and feature selection and generalization was checked using both nested cross-validation and a held-out test set.
resultsThe binary classifier was able to correctly identify 5/6 GSD Ia patients in a held-out test set without generating significant amounts of false positive results. The best model showed excellent performance with a mean received operator curve (ROC) AUC of 0.955 and precision-recall (PR) curve AUC of 0.674 in nested CV.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates an innovative approach to applying machine learning to ultra-rare diseases by accurately identifying GSD Ia patients based on plasma free carnitine and acylcarnitine concentrations, leveraging subtle acylcarnitine abnormalities. Acylcarnitine features that were strong predictors for GSD Ia include C16-carnitine, C14OH-carnitine, total carnitine and acetylcarnitine. The model demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, with selected parameters that were not only robust but also highly interpretable. Our approach offers potential prospect for the inclusion of GSD Ia in newborn screening. Rare diseases are underrepresented in machine learning studies and this work highlights the potential for these techniques, even in ultra-rare diseases such as GSD Ia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.