ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025
Development and external validation of a machine learning model for brain injury in pediatric patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroimaging and Neuropathologic Findings in Pediatric Patients with ECMO: An Imaging-Pathology Comparison.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Roles of necroptosis and autophagy in a mouse model of sepsis-associated encephalopathy.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Development and validation of theAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Neurocritical Care : Multimodal Biosignal Analysis for Prognosis, Monitoring, and Future Pediatric Applications.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Alternate and Emerging Anticoagulation Strategies for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Correlation Between Neuroimaging and Neuropathologic Findings in Pediatric ECMO Patients.Research square · 2026Article
- Exploratory deep-learning-driven early risk stratification of significant neurological injury in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Inflammatory biomarkers and physiological reserve: an explainable machine learning model for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly laparoscopic surgery.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Beyond Standard Parameters: Precision Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients on Veno-Arterial ECMO.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Beyond Biomarkers: Blending Copeptin and Clinical Cues to Distinguish Central Diabetes Insipidus from Primary Polydipsia in Children.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are at a high risk of brain injury, contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to employ machine learning (ML) techniques to predict brain injury in pediatric patients ECMO and identify key variables for future research.
methodsData from pediatric patients undergoing ECMO were collected from the Chinese Society of Extracorporeal Life Support (CSECLS) registry database and local hospitals. Ten ML methods, including random forest, support vector machine, decision tree classifier, gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, Naive Bayes, neural networks, a generalized linear model, and AdaBoost, were employed to develop and validate the optimal predictive model based on accuracy and area under the curve (AUC). Patients were divided into retrospective cohort for model development and internal validation, and one cohort for external validation.
resultsA total of 1,633 patients supported by ECMO were included in the model development, of whom 181 experienced brain injury. In the external validation cohort, 30 of the 154 patients experienced brain injury. Fifteen features were selected for the model construction. Among the ML models tested, the random forest model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.912 for internal validation and 0.807 for external validation.
conclusionThe Random Forest model based on machine learning demonstrates high accuracy and robustness in predicting brain injury in pediatric patients supported by ECMO, with strong generalization capabilities and promising clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.