Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789555›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2025

Characterization and dosimetric predictors for absolute lymphocyte count changes during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of a prospective cohort.

Wei-Xiang Qi, Shuyan Li, Shujun Zhang, Chao Li, Huan Li, Xiaomei Li, Chaofen Zhao, Gang Cai, Cheng Xu, Xuan Han and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wei-Xiang Qi *Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China.
Shuyan Li *Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China.
Shujun Zhang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China.
Chao Li *Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China.
Huan LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China.
Xiaomei LiDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, P. R. China.
Chaofen ZhaoDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, P. R. China.
Gang CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China.
Cheng XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China.
Xuan HanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China.
Yibin ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China. zyb40472@rjh.com.cn.
Jiayi ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China. cjy11756@rjh.com.cn.
Shengguang ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China. zsg10935@rjh.com.cn.

Funding

Beijing Science and Technology Innovation Medical Development Foundation KC2021-JX-0170-9Clinical Research Special Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Health Industry 202340226Shanghai Key Laboratory of Proton-therapy 23dz2261000Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan Medical Innovation Research Project 23Y11904700the National Science Foundation of China 82102819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo characterize the differences of dynamic changes for absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with or without pembrolizumab, as well as to investigate the clinical and lymphocyte-related organs dosimetric parameters that would impact ALC nadir during nCRT. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 216 ESCC patients who received nCRT (with pembrolizumab 144; without pembrolizumab: 72) were identified from a prospective cohort. Weekly and 1-month post-nCRT ALC were identified. lymphocyte-related organs at risk (LOARs) were delineated. linear and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the association between G4 lymphopenia/lymphopenia nadir and clinical/DVHs factors. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to derive optimal dosimetric planning constraints. Grade 4 (G4) lymphopenia was defined as ALC < 0.2 × 10

resultsG4 lymphopenia was observed in 35 ESCC patients (16.2%) during neoadjuvant treatment. Compared to nCRT alone, the addition of pembrolizumab to nCRT significantly improve lymphopenia recovery in the 1-months after nCRT (p = 0.0003), but the ALC at other time point during nCRT and ALC nadir was comparable between the two groups. A total of 198 patients finally received surgery. Of them, 98 patients archived pCR (49.5%), with 50.4% (68/135 patients) in nCRT with pembrolizumab and 47.6% (30/63) in nCRT alone(p = 0.94), respectively. The mean ALC nadir in the pCR group was significantly higher than those without (p = 0.0003). Multivariable linear and logistic regression analysis indicated that TVB mean dose, TVB V5, TVB V10, TVB V20, mean cardiopulmonary dose, mean ribs dose, mean whole body dose, mean spleen dose, V5, V10, and V20 of spleen dose were significantly associated with developing grade 4 lymphopenia. Dosimetric analysis showed that lymphocyte-sparing photon or proton irradiation was feasible while did not compromise clinically acceptable objectives.

conclusionThe addition of pembrolizumab to nCRT improved lymphopenia recovery for ESCC after trimodality therapy. ALC nadir was significantly associated with pCR and RFS after nCRT. Sparing of LOARs using advanced radiation techniques might reduce the risk of developing lymphopenia and improve treatment response in the era of immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountLymphopeniaMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskPrognosisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalpembrolizumabEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaLymphocyte-related organs at riskNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyPembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID39789555
PMCPMC11720911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.