ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Lung ultrasound for assessing disease progression in UIP and NSIP: a comparative study with HRCT and PFT/DLCO.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung ultrasound in UIP and NSIP: clinical and functional associations.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation of lung ultrasound with HRCT in interstitial lung disease: A cross-sectional study.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- Quantitative assessment of thoracic morphometry in interstitial lung diseases: a CT-based comparison of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, usual interstitial pneumonia, and healthy control.Polish journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Imaging in animal models: bridging experimental findings and human pathophysiology.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to compare Lung Ultrasound (LUS) findings with High-Resolution Computerized Tomography (HRCT) and Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs) to detect the severity of lung involvement in patients with Usual Interstitial Pneumonia (UIP) and Non-Specific Interstitial Pneumonia (NSIP).
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 35 UIP and 30 NSIP patients at a referral hospital. All patients underwent LUS, HRCT, and PFT. LUS findings such as B-lines, pleural fragmentation, and pleural thickening were compared with HRCT-based lung involvement and PFT parameters.
resultsIn UIP patients, B-lines > 18 and pleural fragmentation significantly differentiated between < 50% and > 50% HRCT involvement. A logistic regression model showed that B-lines > 18 (OR = 39, p = 0.04) and pleural fragmentation (OR = 22, p = 0.037) independently predicted > 50% HRCT involvement. ROC analysis of the model revealed 84.2% sensitivity and 84.5% specificity. Furthermore, the crude number of B-lines (OR = 1.2, p = 0.038) and > 50% HRCT involvement (OR = 9.5, p = 0.045) independently predicted severe DLCO impairment, with a sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 84.5%. Linear regression showed that each additional B-line was associated with a 0.4% decrease in DLCO (Beta = -0.377, p = 0.043), independent of patient diagnosis. In NSIP patients, no significant correlation was observed between LUS findings and > 50% HRCT involvement (p > 0.05), though B-line numbers and pleural thickening increased in cases with severe DLCO impairment (p < 0.05).
conclusionsLUS shows promise as a sensitive, radiation-free alternative to HRCT in monitoring the severity of UIP. It is particularly valuable in predicting the extent of lung involvement and severe DLCO impairment in UIP patients but has limited application in NSIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.