ArticleBMC cancer2025
CK19 protein expression: the best cutoff value on the prognosis and the prognosis model of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- PD-1/PD-L1 expression and predictive value of efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with anti-PD-1 therapy: a real-world study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- CK7-positive hepatocellular carcinoma represents a distinct subtype: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Radiomics and Deep Learning as Important Techniques of Artificial Intelligence - Diagnosing Perspectives in Cytokeratin 19 Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Review
- Impact of Cytokeratin 19 Expression on the Outcomes of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Postoperative Adjuvant Transcatheterarterial Chemoembolization Should Be Considered Selectively for Patients with Cytokeratin-19 Positive Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIn clinical practice, CK19 can be an important predictor for the prognosis of HCC. Due to the high incidence and mortality rates of HCC, more effective and practical prognostic prediction models need to be developed urgently.
methodsA total of 1,168 HCC patients, who underwent radical surgery at the Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, between January 2014 and July 2019, were recruited, and their clinicopathological data were collected. Among the clinicopathological data, the optimal cutoff value of CK19-positive HCC was determined by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) using survival analysis and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (timeROC) curve analysis. The predictors were screened using univariate and multivariate COX regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to construct nomogram prediction models, and their predictive potentials were assessed using calibration curves and AUC values.
resultsThe 0% positive rate of CK19 was considered the optimal cutoff value to predict the poor prognosis of CK19-positive HCC. The survival analysis of 335 CK19-positive HCC showed no significant statistical differences in the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of CK19-positive HCC patients. A five-factor risk (CK19, CA125, Edmondson, BMI, and tumor number) scoring model and an OS nomograph model were constructed and established, and the OS nomograph model showed a good predictive performance and was subsequently verified.
conclusionA 0% expression level of CK19 protein may be an optimal threshold for predicting the prognosis of CK19-positive HCC. Based on this, CK19 marker a good nomogram model was constructed to predict HCC prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.