ArticleBMC public health2025
Deciphering the psychological tapestry of FGIDs: unveiling the impact of negative affect, rumination, and expression suppression.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetics of resilience with onset and remission of pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders: A longitudinal study.iScience · 2026Article
- From Stress to Safety: The Chain Mediating Role of Cognitive Reappraisal and Work Engagement in the Influence of Nurses' Work Stress on Safety Behavior.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Latent myofascial trigger point injection improves symptoms in functional gastrointestinal disorders.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Multimodal Psychophysiological Assessment Reveals Gastric but Not Cardiac Interoception Deficits in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFunctional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs) constitute a group of psychosomatic diseases characterized primarily by disruptions in the functioning of the digestive system, profoundly impacting the lives of affected individuals.
objectiveThis study aims to investigate the influence of negative affect (NA) on the gastrointestinal symptoms of FGID patients, as well as the mediating role of rumination and the regulatory effects of expression suppression (ES) as an emotional regulation strategy.
methodsA survey was conducted on 1000 patients (403M, 597F) with gastrointestinal disorders at a tertiary hospital using the negative affect subscale from the DS-14 (Type D Personality Scale), the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), the Rumination Response Scale (RRS), and the expression suppression subscale from the Gross-John Emotion Regulation Strategy.
resultsNegative affect positively predicts FGIDs, with rumination mediating the relationship between NA and FGIDs. The emotional regulation strategy of expression suppression moderates the positive relationship between NA and rumination and the mediating effect of rumination.
conclusionNA exacerbates symptoms of FGIDs in individuals, and rumination further amplifies this effect, with the mediating influence evident across both high and low ES emotion regulation strategy groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.