ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2025
Consistency between headache diagnoses and ICHD-3 criteria across different levels of care.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Disrupting the clock: meta-analysis of irregular night shifts and migraine, proposing shift work migraine disorder with chronobiology strategies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Article
- [Development and validation of Cefalytics: an artificial intelligence-based application for the rapid diagnosis of primary headaches].Atencion primaria · 2026Article
- Wearable Nocturnal Autonomic and Sleep Biomarkers for Predicting Next-Day Headache and Identifying Nociplastic Pain in Patients with Migraine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical features and prognostic factors of ovarian cancer brain metastases from ovarian cancer: a retrospective multicenter study of 129 cases.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Sex-related disparities in migraine recognition and management: insights from a tertiary headache center cohort.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Differences in pharmacological migraine treatment across different levels of clinical headache care - a cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Observational
- Consulting, diagnosis and treatment patterns in migraine: results from the Migraine in Poland cross-sectional survey.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Delphi consensus on the real-world application of the updated diagnostic and treatment guidelines for migraine in Asia Pacific.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosing headache disorders poses significant challenges, particularly in primary and secondary levels of care (PSLC), potentially leading to misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis. This study evaluates diagnostic agreement for migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), and cluster headache (CH) between PSLC and tertiary care (TLC) and assesses adherence to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition (ICHD-3) guidelines.
methodsA retrospective, cross-sectional analysis was conducted at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin's tertiary headache center. The patients' self-reported diagnoses from the PSLC were compared with those in TLC and with ICHD-3 criteria. Cohen's kappa (κ) and R² were used to assess diagnostic agreement.
resultsAmong 1,468 patients (43.4 ± 14.4 years; 74.5% women), 69.5% reported a diagnosis in PSLC, and 99.5% were diagnosed at their first TLC visit. Overall agreement between PSLC and TLC was 80% (κ = 0.55; R²=30%). Agreement between the PSLC and ICHD-3 was 77% for migraine, 82% for TTH, and 96% for CH (κ = 0.65; R²=41%). TLC diagnoses aligned with ICHD-3 in over 90%.
conclusionOur findings indicate a significant degree of diagnostic agreement across different levels of care according to the ICHD-3 guidelines. However, there remains insufficient reliability in clinical diagnostics, highlighting the need for continued efforts to improve the early recognition and diagnostic accuracy and consistency of primary headaches to optimize patient care and treatment outcomes in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.