Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789448›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Real-world evidence of remdesivir in formerly hospitalized COVID-19 patients: patient-reported and functional outcomes.

Dorottya Fésü, Enikő Bárczi, Balázs Csoma, Lőrinc Polivka, Márton Boga, Gábor Horváth, János Tamás Varga, Szilvia Sebők, Veronika Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dorottya FésüDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. fesu.dorottya@semmelweis.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0428-703X
Enikő BárcziDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs CsomaDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Lőrinc PolivkaDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Márton BogaHeart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor HorváthDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4079-1698
János Tamás VargaDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Szilvia SebőkDepartment of Pharmacy Administration, University Pharmacy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Veronika MüllerDepartment of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8552-1336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-COVID condition (PCC) is characterized by persisting symptoms after the resolution of acute COVID-19. Remdesivir (RDV), a broad-spectrum antiviral drug, has been widely used in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 requiring oxygen therapy. We aimed to evaluate the effects of RDV on PCC by assessing patient-reported and functional outcomes.

methodsWe used the data from a single-center registry, including formerly hospitalized post-COVID patients (N = 293). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used (16 criteria, 1:1 ratio) to obtain two comparable groups: those who received standard-of-care (SOC, N = 94) and those treated with RDV in addition to SOC (SOC + RDV, N = 94). Primary outcomes were asymptomatic status and at least 50% symptom score reduction at post-COVID follow-up. Secondary outcomes included results of pulmonary function (PF) tests, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires.

resultsAfter PSM, baseline patient characteristics showed no significant differences between the two groups. Most patients were still symptomatic (60% vs. 66%). In the SOC + RDV group, the use of oxygen supplementation (94 vs. 80%, p = 0.005) and steroids (97 vs. 88%, p = 0.027) during infection were higher, while patients presented at their post-COVID visits earlier (median 68 vs. 97 days, p = 0.003). Complete or at least 50% symptom resolution were reported at a significantly earlier stage after infection in the SOC + RDV group compared to the SOC group (multivariable-adjusted HR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.33-3.92, p = 0.003; and HR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.43-3.02, p < 0.001; respectively). In the SOC + RDV group, fewer patients experienced sleep disturbances at PCC, and sleep-related questionnaires (Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) results showed significantly better sleep quality (14 vs. 27% and 5.9 vs. 7.7 points, respectively). There were no notable differences in results of PF tests, 6MWT, and other QoL questionnaires.

conclusionIn this propensity score matched cohort, the use of RDV was associated with earlier patient reported symptom resolution during the PCC period, while there were no notable differences in functional outcomes. Our results indicate a possible beneficial effect of RDV in terms of faster symptom resolution after COVID19 infection.

Indexed as

Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHospitalizationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsremdesivirAntiviral agentsPost-acute COVID-19 syndromePost-infectious disordersQuality of lifeRemdesivirSymptom burden

Identifiers

PMID39789448
PMCPMC11715443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.