ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Acute aortic dissection on CT: is D-dimer determination useful for a timely and correct diagnosis? A case report.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison and analysis of the diagnostic value of color doppler ultrasound and CT for abdominal aortic dissection aneurysm.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChest pain is a common reason patients are admitted to the hospital. The most clinically significant cases are those in which the pain is due to an immediate life-threatening condition, such as acute aortic dissection (AAD). A prompt and correct diagnosis is crucial to patient survival. This case report of a patient who presented with chest pain confirms the appropriateness of urgent imaging tests e.g. POCUS when AAD is suspected in high-risk patients, regardless of the results of additional laboratory tests such as the D-dimer (DD) assay. CASE REPORT: A 72-year-old female patient was brought by the emergency medical team to the emergency room due to fainting without loss of consciousness and severe chest pain. Owing to worsening hypotonia and recurrent chest pain, a thoracic computed tomography (CT scan) was performed and subsequently revealed aortic dissection within the ascending segment with bleeding into the pericardial sac. The results of previously ordered laboratory tests, including the DD assay, were unremarkable and were obtained only after the thoracic CT scan had been acquired. Despite prompt medical intervention, the patient died.
conclusionVigilance is required when diagnosing chest pain in high-risk patients who are suspected of having AAD. The case presented in this report confirms the importance of a thorough history and physical examination as well as prompt diagnostic imaging e.g. POCUS or CT scan. Dedicated laboratory tests such as the DD assay, while often helpful, may fail to reveal remarkable abnormalities in time for medical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.