ArticleInvestigational new drugs2025
Investigation of the association between therapeutic effectiveness of anamorelin and Glasgow prognostic score in patients with cancer cachexia: a competing risk analysis.
Article in Investigational new drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of anamorelin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving systemic chemotherapy: a randomized controlled study.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of anamorelin for cancer cachexia in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Effect of anamorelin on body weight in patients with gastric cancer-associated cachexia: an observational study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025Observational
- Does anamorelin have beneficial effects in advanced cancer patients with systemic inflammation in the real world?Investigational new drugs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anamorelin, a highly selective ghrelin receptor agonist, enhances appetite and increases lean body mass in patients with cancer cachexia. However, the predictors of its therapeutic effectiveness are uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the association between the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), used for classifying the severity of cancer cachexia, the therapeutic effectiveness of anamorelin, and the feasibility of early treatment based on cancer types. A retrospective analysis included patients with gastric, pancreatic, colorectal, and non-small-cell lung cancer treated with anamorelin between May 2021 and July 2022. The endpoints were the response rate for increased appetite within 3 weeks of treatment initiation and the time to treatment failure (TTF) due to therapeutic failure of anamorelin. Multivariate logistic regression model and Fine and Gray's model were used for analysis. Of the 137 patients in this analysis, 51% of patients had a GPS of 0 or 1, and 49% of those had a GPS of 2. Patients with a GPS of 2 showed a lower response for increased appetite than those with a GPS of 0 or 1 (adjusted odds ratio 0.29 [95% CI 0.12-0.72], P = 0.007). Additionally, TTF was shorter in patients with a GPS of 2 with a GPS of 0 or 1 (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 2.22 [95% CI 1.22-4.03], P = 0.009). Anamorelin could be more effective in improving appetite and prolonging the duration of treatment effect in patients with a GPS of 0 or 1 than those with a GPS of 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39789368What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.