ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Machine learning-based prediction model integrating ultrasound scores and clinical features for the progression to rheumatoid arthritis in patients with undifferentiated arthritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting the risk of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis using a SHAP-based interpretable machine learning model.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Cutaneous Thermography in Arthropathies: Quantitative Imaging, Machine Learning, and Clinical Translation.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a combined ultrasound-radiomics model for assessing rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: a prospective, two-center diagnostic study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in rheumatology: A transformative perspective.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2025Article
- Targeted Detection of 76 Carnitine Indicators Combined with a Machine Learning Algorithm Based on HPLC-MS/MS in the Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Current application, possibilities, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPredicting rheumatoid arthritis (RA) progression in undifferentiated arthritis (UA) patients remains a challenge. Traditional approaches combining clinical assessments and ultrasonography (US) often lack accuracy due to the complex interaction of clinical variables, and routine extensive US is impractical. Machine learning (ML) models, particularly those integrating the 18-joint ultrasound scoring system (US18), have shown potential to address these issues but remain underexplored. This study aims to evaluate ML models integrating US18 with clinical data to improve early identification of high-risk patients and support personalized treatment strategies.
methodsIn this prospective cohort, 432 UA patients were followed for 1 year to track progression to RA. Four ML algorithms and one deep learning model were developed using baseline clinical and US18 data. Comparative experiments on a testing cohort identified the optimal model. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis highlighted key variables, validated through an ablation experiment.
resultsOf the 432 patients, 152 (35.2%) progressed to the RA group, while 280 (64.8%) remained in the non-RA group. The Random Forest (RnFr) model demonstrated the highest accuracy and sensitivity. SHAP analysis identified joint counts at US18 Grade 2, total US18 score, and swollen joint count as the most influential variables. The ablation experiment confirmed the importance of US18 in enhancing early RA detection.
conclusionsIntegrating the US18 assessment with clinical data in an RnFr model significantly improves early detection of RA progression in UA patients, offering potential for earlier and more personalized treatments. Key Points • A machine learning model integrating clinical and ultrasound features effectively predicts rheumatoid arthritis progression in undifferentiated arthritis patients. • The 18-joint ultrasound scoring system (US18) enhances predictive accuracy, particularly when incorporated with clinical variables in a Random Forest model. • SHAP analysis underscores that joint severity levels in US18 contribute significantly to early identification of high-risk patients. • This study offers a feasible and efficient approach for clinical implementation, supporting more personalized and timely RA treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39789318What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.