Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789312›Full record

Trial reportMolecular psychiatry2025

Re-encountering the phobic cue within days after a reconsolidation intervention is crucial to observe a lasting fear reduction in spider phobia.

Jacqueline Peters, Anna I Filmer, Johnny B van Doorn, Vivian N Metselaar, Renée M Visser, Merel Kindt

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Act of Measurement: The Influence of Behavioural Tests on Spider Fear and Disgust.Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacqueline PetersDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.peters@rug.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1463-8449
Anna I FilmerDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-9176
Johnny B van DoornDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0270-096X
Vivian N MetselaarDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renée M VisserDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0376-8165
Merel KindtDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.kindt@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7989-3195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory reconsolidation interventions offer an exciting alternative to exposure treatment because they may target fear memories directly, thereby preventing relapse. A previous reconsolidation intervention for spider fear abruptly reduced avoidance behaviour, whereas changes in self-reported fear followed later. In this pre-registered placebo-controlled study, we first aimed to conceptually replicate these effects in spider phobia. Second, we investigated whether re-encountering the phobic cue after the reconsolidation intervention is necessary for changes in self-reported fear to occur. Third, we tested whether the window to trigger such changes is time limited. Individuals with spider phobia (N = 69) were randomized into three groups and underwent a memory reactivation procedure with a tarantula, followed immediately by propranolol (reconsolidation intervention) or placebo. One reconsolidation intervention group and the placebo group re-encountered spiders two days after treatment in behavioural approach tasks, whereas another reconsolidation intervention group re-encountered spiders after four weeks. Changes in spider avoidance behaviour and self-reported fear were followed for one year. In the short term, the reconsolidation intervention was not more effective than placebo: both conditions benefited from the intervention. In the long term, the reconsolidation intervention was more effective than placebo, but only when the phobic stimulus was re-encountered within days after treatment. Specifically, we found less tarantula avoidance behaviour and self-reported fear over the course of one year when spiders were re-encountered two days after the reconsolidation intervention, but not when the behavioural test was conducted four weeks after the intervention. These findings challenge the idea that a reconsolidation-inspired intervention alone is sufficient to treat clinical fears: Experiencing the behavioural change during the re-encounter within days after the reconsolidation window has closed seems crucial to observe a lasting fear reduction.

Indexed as

FearMemory ConsolidationPhobic DisordersAdultAnimalsAvoidance LearningCuesFemaleHumansMalePropranololSpidersYoung AdultPropranolol

Identifiers

PMID39789312
PMCPMC12092263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.