ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploratory disproportionality analysis of potentially drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia using United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drug-Induced Intestinal Angioedema: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database and Literature Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is an uncommon adverse drug reaction. Many drugs have been reported to cause EP, the evidence mainly being in the form of case reports/case series. This study aims to conduct an exploratory analysis of the United States Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database to identify previously unknown drugs that can cause EP and supplement the available evidence for known culprit drugs. A retrospective case-noncase study was conducted using individual case safety reports (ICSRs) reported to the US FAERS from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2024. Cases of potentially drug-induced EP were identified using OpenVigil application by conducting a narrow and broad scope search using the Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities preferred terms. A base list of drugs described in select literature to have caused EP was used to categorize known and unknown drugs. A disproportionality analysis was performed, with a reporting odds ratio > 2, lower end of the 95% confidence interval > 1, and a minimum of 3 reported cases considered a signal of disproportionate reporting (SDR). During the study period, 8,702,548 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were submitted to the FAERS. Of these, 855 ICSRs using the narrow scope search and 1411 ICSRs using the broad scope search reported EP. The three most commonly reported drugs with an SDR for EP using the narrow scope search were daptomycin, naltrexone, and prednisone. The most common indications for the use of the drugs were infections, immunological conditions, asthma, and central nervous system disorders. In total, there were 45 drugs with an SDR but no supporting literature evidence available. The number of drugs implicated in causing EP has increased over the years. Several antimicrobial agents, followed by drugs affecting the central nervous system and anticancer drugs, including monoclonal antibodies, can produce EP. The list of suspected drugs identified in this study, especially those with SDR and literature evidence, should be strongly considered as a possible cause in patients presenting with pneumonia not explained otherwise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.