ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Age Matters: Early-Onset Rectal Cancer Exhibits Higher Rates of Pathological Complete Response: A Retrospective Analysis of the Influence of Young Age on Treatment Success in Stage II-III Rectal Cancer.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Factors for Patients Under 45 Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A SEER Population-Based Study.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical and treatment-related predictors of complete response after total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer in a large multicenter analysis.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Systemic nutritional status and its dynamic changes as predictors of response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced MSS/pMMR colorectal cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Overcoming the Challenge: A Comprehensive Review of Neoadjuvant Treatment Resistance in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of rectal cancer has decreased overall, but the incidence of early-onset rectal cancer (eoRC) has increased. Early-onset rectal cancer and late-onset rectal cancer (loRC) differ due to phenotypical, genetic characteristics, and higher stage presentations in eoRC. Thus, eoRC patients undergo more aggressive neoadjuvant treatments. This paper was designed to evaluate the impact of age on the pathological complete response rates in sporadic locally advanced rectal cancer.
methodsAll patients with stage II-III rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and curative rectal resection between January 2018 and December 2023 were included and allocated to eoRC (<50 years) and loRC (≥50 years) groups based on their age at diagnosis.
resultsA total of 381 patients were included (93 eoRC and 288 loRC). Preoperative radiological imaging revealed higher clinical nodal staging in the eoRC group (p = 0.002). A higher proportion of eoRC resulted in a pathological complete response compared with loRC (29% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.035). The rate of pathological complete response in eoRC and loRC did not differ between patients treated by total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and those treated by standard chemoradiotherapy (29.2% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.95 in eoRC and 21.7% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.097 in loRC). Multivariable analysis resulted in young age of onset (odds ratio 2.68; 95% confidence interval 1.11-6.51; p = 0.029) and KRAS wildtype (odds ratio 3.37; 95% confidence interval 1.25-9.07; p = 0.016) as being independent predictors of pathological complete response.
conclusionsSporadic eoRC and KRAS wildtype tumors are predictive factors for pathological complete response in stage II-III rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39789280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.