Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789272›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

"Just Be Relentless," Lessons Learned from In-Hospital Addiction Consult Service Implementation.

Beth E Williams, Alisa Patten, Linda Peng, Honora Englander

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beth E WilliamsSection of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. willbeth@ohsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4742-966X
Alisa PattenSection of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Linda PengSection of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Honora EnglanderSection of Addiction Medicine in Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

Vanderbilt Oregon COllaborative Scholar Training in Addiction Research (COSTAR)K12DA061526 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW S FREIBERG, Philip Todd Korthuis · 2024 to 2026
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS K12 DA061526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitalization is a "reachable" moment to engage people in addiction care. Addiction consult services (ACSs) have been shown to improve outcomes for hospitalized patients with substance use disorders (SUDs). Despite this, most hospital systems do not provide hospital-based addiction care or have an ACS.

objectiveCharacterize implementation barriers, lessons learned, and opportunities for future support of ACS implementation. DESIGN AND

participantsSemi-structured qualitative interviews with 17 "champions" leading ACS implementation at 11 institutions across the U.S. APPROACH: Interviews explored evolution of ACSs, including staffing, service delivery, strategic planning, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied to identify emergent themes. KEY

resultsFive dominant themes characterize ACS implementation: (1) how champions obtain buy-in from hospital leadership. Participants described the impression that ACSs are not revenue-generators as a barrier to implementation and found ways to capture monetary and non-monetary outcomes to demonstrate value; (2) specific attributes are common to ACS champions including persistence, good communication, and leadership skills. ACS champions described needing to communicate strategically with multiple stakeholders across their institution and often pitched their case multiple times before obtaining funding; (3) reliance on external resources. This included informal coaching from other ACS leaders and formal tools such as telementoring networks and published literature to learn to engage leadership and present a business case; (4) ACSs are important drivers of cultural change within institutions in the face of significant stigma and; (5) planning for sustainability. This included demonstrating improved quality of care and patient and provider satisfaction to obtain ongoing support for ACS.

conclusionsBarriers to ACS implementation are common and significant and the process of obtaining leadership support for implementation is often long and iterative. Broad adoption of ACSs will require support from hospital systems and policymakers including incentives, funding, and infrastructure to support clinical champions.

Indexed as

HospitalizationReferral and ConsultationSubstance-Related DisordersHumansQualitative ResearchUnited Statesaddictionclinical championhospital consult servicehospital systemssubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID39789272
PMCPMC12463784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.