ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025
Comparative Analysis of Systemic Immune Responses and Metastatic Risks in Tumor Ablation: An Animal Study of Radiofrequency Ablation and Irreversible Electroporation with Immune Modulation.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The tumor microenvironment in triple negative breast cancer and a strategy to improve responses to immunotherapy using cryoablation and immunostimulants.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Electricity-Based Locoregional Cancer Therapies and Their Associated Drug Delivery Technologies: From Principles of Action to Clinical Implications.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
- Anti-PD-1 synergizes with RFA to suppress abscopal tumors and induce durable memory against recurrence in HCC.Liver research (Beijing, China) · 2025Article
- Commentary on: Comparative Analysis of Systemic Immune Responses and Metastatic Risks in Tumor Ablation: An Animal Study of Radiofrequency Ablation and Irreversible Electroporation with Immune Modulation.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare systemic immune responses and metastatic effects induced by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and irreversible electroporation (IRE) in murine tumor models. We assessed cytokine production, growth of treated and untreated metastatic tumors, and synergy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). MATERIALS AND
methodsHep55.1c murine hepatoma cells were implanted in C57BL/6N mice to establish primary tumors. In Experiment 1 (n = 50), RFA or IRE was applied to primary tumors, followed by CD8
resultsBoth techniques induced significant CD8
conclusionThe results of this animal study indicate that both techniques promote systemic anti-tumor immunity, though IRE uniquely induces an inflammatory response that risks exacerbating micro-metastases through IL-6. Combining IRE with IL-6 blockade may offer a promising strategy for nonthermal tumor ablation therapies. Further studies are warranted to refine ablation-immune therapy combinations for optimal therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39789251What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.