ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Statistical learning of spatiotemporal target regularities in the absence of saliency.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In previous studies, it was established that individuals can implicitly learn spatiotemporal regularities related to how the distribution of target locations unfolds across the time course of a single trial. However, these regularities were tied to the appearance of salient targets that are known to capture attention in a bottom-up way. The current study investigated whether the saliency of target is necessary for this type of learning to occur. In a visual search task, participants were instructed to search for a unique circle with a gap (Landolt C) among two other circles and indicate the location of the gap. Unbeknownst to them, the onset timing of search displays predicted the target location. Specifically, the target appeared more frequently at one peripheral location with an early onset of the search display and at the opposite peripheral location with a late onset of the search display. Additionally, we manipulated the gap size of the Landolt C to create either nonsalient (small gap) or salient (big gap) target events. Results showed that, regardless of prior exposure to salient targets (Experiment 1) or nonsalient targets (Experiment 2), visual search efficiency increased when the target appeared at the temporally valid location compared with the temporally invalid location. In conclusion, the saliency of targets and the associated bottom-up capture is not a prerequisite for learning dynamic distributional regularities of target locations during visual search.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.