Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789185›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The trophic distribution of biomass in ecosystems with co-occurring wildlife and livestock.

James D M Speed, Anna Sobocinski, Anders L Kolstad, John D C Linnell, Erling J Solberg, Jenny Mattisson, Gunnar Austrheim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James D M SpeedDepartment of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. james.speed@ntnu.no.
Anna SobocinskiDepartment of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Anders L KolstadNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 5685, NO-7485, Trondheim, Norway.
John D C LinnellNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Vormstuguveien 40, 2624, Lillehammer, Norway.
Erling J SolbergNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 5685, NO-7485, Trondheim, Norway.
Jenny MattissonNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 5685, NO-7485, Trondheim, Norway.
Gunnar AustrheimDepartment of Natural History, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trophic interactions regulate populations, but anthropogenic processes influence primary productivity and consumption by both herbivore and carnivore species. Trophic ecology studies often focus on natural systems such as protected areas, even though livestock globally comprise the majority of terrestrial vertebrate biomass. Here we explore spatial and temporal patterns in the distribution of biomass between plants, and large herbivores and carnivores (> 10 kg) in Norwegian rangelands, including both wildlife and livestock. We find high spatial variation in the relationship between plant and herbivore biomass, with both positive and negative divergence in observed biomass from expectations based on primary productivity. Meanwhile, despite recent partial recoveries in carnivore densities across Norway, carnivore biomass is still lower than expected based on herbivore biomass, even if livestock are excluded from the estimation. Our study highlights how temporal trends in both herbivores and carnivores reflect policy development. The role of livestock husbandry and wildlife management is thus key in determining realised biomass distributions in anthropogenically influenced ecosystems.

Indexed as

Animals, WildBiomassEcosystemHerbivoryLivestockAnimalsFood ChainNorwayPlantsCarnivoreHerbivoreManagementNet primary productivityPredation

Identifiers

PMID39789185
PMCPMC11718189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.