Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789162›Full record

ArticleNature food2025

State-level policies alone are insufficient to meet the federal food waste reduction goal in the United States.

Sarah Kakadellis, Selena Mao, Asch Harwood, Edward S Spang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah KakadellisDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA. skakadellis@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7757-1803
Selena MaoReFED, Chicago, IL, USA.
Asch HarwoodReFED, Chicago, IL, USA.
Edward S SpangDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA. esspang@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9883-078X

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2115405United States Department of Agriculture | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) CA-D-FST-2591-RRUnited States Department of Agriculture | Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) NR223A750013G036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States Food Loss and Waste Reduction Goal seeks to reduce national food waste by 50%, down to 74 kg per capita, by 2030. Here we investigate state policies' alignment with the federal goal across four policy categories. We develop a policy scoring matrix and apply it to wasted food solutions listed in the non-profit ReFED's database to derive ranges of food waste diversion potential and projected generation across states. On the basis of state policies alone, no state can meet the federal target. We estimated a diversion potential of 5-14 kg per capita and a food waste generation of 149 kg per capita nationally in 2022, equivalent to the 2016 baseline. Without additional intervention at the state and federal level promoting a shift from food waste recycling towards prevention, rescue and repurposing, food generation in the United States will probably remain high.

Indexed as

FoodFood SupplyState GovernmentWaste ManagementFederal GovernmentFood Loss and WasteHumansRecyclingUnited StatesFood Loss and Waste

Identifiers

PMID39789162
PMCPMC11850282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.