Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789143›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An optimized LSTM-based deep learning model for anomaly network intrusion detection.

Nitu Dash, Sujata Chakravarty, Amiya Kumar Rath, Nimay Chandra Giri, Kareem M AboRas, N Gowtham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Application of AI in Cyberattack Detection: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nitu DashDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, BPUT, Rourkela, Odisha, India.
Sujata ChakravartyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Amiya Kumar RathDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, BPUT, Rourkela, Odisha, India.
Nimay Chandra GiriDepartment Electronics and Communication Engineering, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Jatni, Odisha, 752050, India.
Kareem M AboRasDepartment of Electrical Power and Machines, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, 21544, Alexandria, Egypt.
N GowthamDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. gowtham.n@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of network connections is driving a continuous surge in the requirement for network security and safeguarding against cyberattacks. This has triggered the need to develop and implement intrusion detection systems (IDS), one of the key components of network perimeter aimed at thwarting and alleviating the issues presented by network invaders. Over time, intrusion detection systems have been instrumental in identifying network breaches and deviations. Several researchers have recommended the implementation of machine learning approaches in IDSs to counteract the menace posed by network intruders. Nevertheless, most previously recommended IDSs exhibit a notable false alarm rate. To mitigate this challenge, exploring deep learning methodologies emerges as a viable solution, leveraging their demonstrated efficacy across various domains. Hence, this article proposes an optimized Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) for identifying anomalies in network traffic. The presented model uses three optimization methods, i.e., Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), JAYA, and Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA), to optimize the hyperparameters of LSTM. In this study, NSL KDD, CICIDS, and BoT-IoT datasets are taken into consideration. To evaluate the efficacy of the proposed model, several indicators of performance like Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F-score, True Positive Rate (TPR), False Positive Rate (FPR), and Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) have been chosen. A comparative analysis of PSO-LSTMIDS, JAYA-LSTMIDS, and SSA-LSTMIDS is conducted. The simulation results demonstrate that SSA-LSTMIDS surpasses all the models examined in this study across all three datasets.

Indexed as

Intrusion detection system (IDS)JAYA optimizationLong short-term memory (LSTM)Particle swarm optimization (PSO)Salp swarm algorithm (SSA)

Identifiers

PMID39789143
PMCPMC11718078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.