ArticleScientific reports2025
Using XBGoost, an interpretable machine learning model, for diagnosing prostate cancer in patients with PSA < 20 ng/ml based on the PSAMR indicator.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To create a diagnostic tool before biopsy for patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels < 20 ng/ml to minimize prostate biopsy-related discomfort and risks. Data from 655 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College from July 2021 to January 2023 were collected and analyzed. After applying the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling TEchnique class balancing on the training set, multiple machine learning models were constructed by using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) feature selection to identify the significant variables. The best-performing model was selected and evaluated through tenfold cross-validation to ensure interpretability. Finally, the performance was assessed using the test set data for validation. The age, prostate-specific antigen mass ratio (PSAMR), Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System, and prostate volume were selected as the variables for model construction based on the LASSO regression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) results for multiple models in the validation set were as follows: XGBoost: 0.93 (0.88-0.97); logistic: 0.89 (0.83-0.95); LightGBM: 0.87 (0.80-0.93); AdaBoost: 0.90 (0.85-0.96); GNB: 0.88 (0.82-0.95); CNB: 0.79 (0.71-0.87); MLP: 0.78 (0.69-0.86); and Support Vector Machine: 0.81 (0.73-0.89). XGBoost was selected as the best model and reconstructed with tenfold cross-validation on the training data, resulting in the following ROC scores: training set 0.995 (0.991-0.999), validation set 0.945 (0.885-0.997 ), and test set 0.920 (0.868-0.972). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov curve, calibration curve and learning curve yielded positive results; The decision curve demonstrates that patients with threshold probabilities ranging from 10 to 95% can benefit from this model. We developed an XGBoost machine learning model based on the PSAMR indicator and interpreted it using the SHapley Additive exPlanations method. The model offered a high-performance non-invasive technique to diagnose prostate cancer in patients with PSA levels < 20 ng/ml.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.