ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization of parallel coiled cavities of different depths in microperforated panel sound absorbers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a microperforated panel (MPP) sound absorber with parallel coiled-up-cavities of different-depths (PCD) and the corresponding optimization on their cavities. In this study, an analytical model is initially proposed for estimating the cavity depths of the PCD-MPP absorber upon normal incidence absorption coefficient evaluation at given resonance frequencies. Cavity effective depths and normal incidence absorption coefficient are evaluated after coiling up cavities for a compact structure. Numerical simulations with the finite element method and experiments are conducted for validations. Subsequently, a design process is suggested on the basis of the proposed model for sound absorption optimization. Results show that, absorption coefficient from the proposed analytical model agrees well with finite element simulations and experiments. It is also shown that, for the effective depth evaluation of the coiled-up cavities of PCD-MPP absorbers, the diagonal lines of subchannels of coiled-up cavities with a coiled-up angle of 180° can accurately represent the effective depths, while the combination of centerlines of subchannels and quarter arc inside the coiled-up area is more suitable for those with a coiled-up angle of 90°. Optimization investigation shows that, PCD-MPP absorbers can have high absorption performance with the averaged and maximum absorption coefficient of 0.91 and 0.98 within the target bandwidth of 400-1600 Hz, where the absorber thickness can stay below 65 mm. This work can provide valuable guidelines for the design of sound absorbers for broadband absorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.