ArticleScientific reports2025
Unveiling the molecular mechanisms of recurrent miscarriage through endoplasmic reticulum stress related gene expression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recurrent miscarriage (RM) is a reproductive disorder affecting couples worldwide. The underlying molecular mechanisms remain elusive, even though emerging evidence has implicated endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS). We investigated RM- and ERS-related genes to develop a diagnostic model that can enhance predictive ability. We utilized the R package GEO query to extract and process Gene Expression Omnibus data, applying batch correction, normalization, and differential gene expression analysis with limma. ERS-related differentially expressed genes (ERSRGs) were identified through Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of genes and genomes analyses, and their diagnostic potential was assessed. Diagnostic models were developed using logistic regression, support vector machines, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operators, complemented by immune infiltration analysis and regulatory network construction. Integrated analysis revealed 1395 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 626 upregulated and 769 downregulated genes. Seventeen ERSRGs were identified. KEAP1 and YIPF5 displayed high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] > 0.9). Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of genes and genomes analyses highlighted the role of ESRDEGs in cellular responses to ERS, protein processing, and apoptosis. Diagnostic models demonstrated robust predictive performance (AUC > 0.9). A molecular interaction was found between RM and the ERS response, and the identified ESRDEGs could serve as potential biomarkers for diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.