Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39789016›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Research on health monitoring of concrete structure based on G-S-G.

Jiaqi Wang, Hongbi Kang, Kexin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiaqi WangDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Beihua University, Jilin, China.
Hongbi KangDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Beihua University, Jilin, China.
Kexin LiCivil and Transportation College, Beihua University, Jilin, China. likenefu@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An improved concrete structure health monitoring method based on G-S-G is proposed, which fully combines an optimized Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) with an improved Self-Organizing Map (SOM) neural network to achieve accurate and real-time concrete structure health monitoring. First of all, in order to obtain a dynamic image of the crack damage region of interest (ROI) with clear contrast and obvious target, the image acquisition system and image optimization method are used to process the damaged image. Moreover, in order to realize the accurate location of crack damage, crack damage identification research based on GLCM-SOM effectively eliminates the interference of honeycomb and pothole damage on crack damage. In order to obtain the indicators for monitoring the health status of the structure, the damage characteristics and probability distribution characteristics of the concrete structure in the gray level co-occurrence matrix are combined to extract the probability range index (PRI). On the basis of extracting the crack damage index, in order to verify the reliability of the sensitive feature index, starting from the two dimensions of damage texture feature and data expansion, through reverse research of the damage model, the damage index of accurately locating the crack damage was selected. It follows that the final sensitive indicators: entropy (ENT) and PRI can be used for structural health monitoring because of their strong damage characterization ability and sensitivity to damage characteristics. This research shows that is helpful to realize the high precision intelligent concrete structure health monitoring of modern concrete structure crack damage.

Indexed as

Damages index extractionGray level co-occurrence matrixSelf-organizing map neural networkStructural health monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39789016
PMCPMC11718042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.