ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning algorithms for predicting delayed hyponatremia after transsphenoidal surgery for patients with pituitary adenoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in pituitary surgery: the path to clinical solutions.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Review
- Construction and validation of a LASSO penalized logistic regression model predicting hypernatremia after pituitary adenoma surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven approaches in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: integrating endocrine-metabolic profiling for enhanced diagnostics and therapeutics.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Radiomics-based multiple machine learning approaches for investigating medial wall invasion of the cavernous sinus in pituitary adenomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict the occurrence of delayed hyponatremia after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. We retrospectively collected clinical data on patients with pituitary adenomas treated with transsphenoidal surgery between January 2010 and December 2020. From January 2021 to December 2022, patients with pituitary adenomas were prospectively enrolled. We trained seven ML models to predict delayed hyponatremia using the clinical variables in the training set. The final model was internally validated using a test set and a prospective dataset. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm was used to determine the significance of each variable in the occurrence of delayed hyponatremia. In the training dataset, the best predictive performance was observed for XGBoost (area under the ROC curve; AUC = 0.821), followed by Random Forest (AUC = 0.8), Logistic Regression (AUC = 0.793), Support Vector Machine (AUC = 0.776), naïve Bayes (AUC = 0.774), K-Nearest Neighbors (AUC = 0.742), and Decision Tree (AUC = 0.717). The AUC of the XGBoost model for the test and prospective datasets are 0.831 and 0.785, respectively. The differences in pituitary stalk deviation angle, the "measurable pituitary stalk" length before and after surgery, and blood sodium concentration between preoperative and postoperative day 2 were important variables for predicting delayed hyponatremia as determined by the SHAP algorithm. The XGBoost model was best able to predict delayed hyponatremia after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. The differences in pituitary stalk deviation angle, pre- versus postoperative "measurable pituitary stalk" length, and pre- versus postoperative day 2 blood sodium concentrations were important variables for predicting delayed hyponatremia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.