Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39788979›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Bioinspired self-flowing wood chemical treatment.

Xuan Wang, Sheldon Q Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xuan WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Process Institute (AMMPI), University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.
Sheldon Q ShiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Process Institute (AMMPI), University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA. sheldon.shi@unt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wood has complex composition and structure, which make it difficult to achieve consistent and controllable treatment. A self-flowing process presented for the chemical treatment of wood is inspired by liquid transportation in trees during photosynthesis and tree growth, whereby liquid in the soil is brought through the natural vessels and/or fiber tracheids. In this process, wood lumbers are placed in a tank containing treatment chemicals such as preservatives, fire retardants, or reactive agents. Through an absorbent sheet bridging the untreated lumber to an overflow tank, the chemicals are drawn into the lumber under capillary force and pressure difference, so that continuous treatment occurs inside the wood. Effectiveness of the self-flowing process is evaluated and compared to conventional immersion and vacuum wood treatment methods. The self-flowing method is very effective for wood delignification, which is six and four times more effective than that from immersion and vacuum pressure treatment methods, respectively. The self-flowing process allows a more uniform wood treatment compared to that from the immersion and vacuum pressure methods. A mathematical model was developed to describe the self-flowing process. This model can accurately predict the treatment time required for achieving desired results under various conditions.

Identifiers

PMID39788979
PMCPMC11718251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.