Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39788931›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Hyperedge overlap drives explosive transitions in systems with higher-order interactions.

Federico Malizia, Santiago Lamata-Otín, Mattia Frasca, Vito Latora, Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut Microbial Topology and Metabolic Signatures Associated With Colorectal Neoplasia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Drivers of cooperation in social dilemmas on higher-order networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Federico Malizia *Network Science Institute, Northeastern University London, London, UK.
Santiago Lamata-Otín *Department of Condensed Matter Physics, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0247-4792
Mattia FrascaDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science Engineering, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-0576
Vito LatoraDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. v.latora@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0984-8038
Jesús Gómez-GardeñesDepartment of Condensed Matter Physics, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. gardenes@unizar.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5204-1937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that novel collective behaviors emerge in complex systems due to the presence of higher-order interactions. However, how the collective behavior of a system is influenced by the microscopic organization of its higher-order interactions is not fully understood. In this work, we introduce a way to quantify the overlap among the hyperedges of a higher-order network, and we show that real-world systems exhibit different levels of intra-order hyperedge overlap. We then study two types of dynamical processes on higher-order networks, namely complex contagion and synchronization, finding that intra-order hyperedge overlap plays a universal role in determining the collective behavior in a variety of systems. Our results demonstrate that the presence of higher-order interactions alone does not guarantee abrupt transitions. Rather, explosivity and bistability require a microscopic organization of the structure with a low value of intra-order hyperedge overlap.

Identifiers

PMID39788931
PMCPMC11718204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.