Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39788839›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Disability-Related Disparities in Screening for Intimate Partner Violence During the Perinatal Period: A Population-Based Study.

Kathryn Laughon, Rosemary B Hughes, Genevieve Lyons, Kana Roarty, Jeanne Alhusen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn LaughonUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: klc6e@virginia.edu.
Rosemary B HughesUniversity of Montana Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, Missoula, Montana.
Genevieve LyonsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Kana RoartyUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Jeanne AlhusenUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Funding

Psychosocial stress and its relation to maternal and infant outcomes among women with disabilitiesR01HD102927 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ALHUSEN, JEANNE L · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD102927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons with disabilities are at higher risk of experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) during the perinatal period than persons without disabilities. Although screening for IPV during the perinatal period is recommended by many organizations, little is known about screening rates for IPV by disability status.

methodsOur objective was to compare rates of IPV screening during the perinatal period among persons with and without disabilities in the United States. A cross-sectional sample of 43,837 respondents provided data on disability, including difficulty in vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, communication, and self-care. We conducted a secondary analysis of nationally representative data from the 2018-2020 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

resultsDuring pregnancy, respondents with disabilities had a lower odds of IPV screening as compared with respondents without disabilities (adjusted odds ratio .83, 95% confidence interval [.70, .99]). Despite similar screening rates in the 12 months before conception and postpartum among respondents with and without disabilities who attended health care visits, those with disabilities were less likely to receive pregnancy-related care during pregnancy (p < .0001) and in the postpartum period (p < .0001) and thus missed opportunities to be screened.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate a need for health care providers to collaborate with policy makers, disability advocates, and researchers to reduce the disparities people with disabilities face in accessing health care, including screening for IPV during the perinatal period. Such efforts are essential for maximizing the health and safety of pregnant persons and new parents with disabilities and their children during the perinatal period.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesIntimate Partner ViolenceMass ScreeningPerinatal CarePersons with DisabilitiesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39788839
PMCPMC11911073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.