Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39788775›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior double-blinded randomised controlled trial in China comparing the efficacy and safety of high-frequency irreversible electroporation with transurethral resection of the prostate in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (the GIANT trial).

Bi-Ming He, Zhen-Kai Shi, Rui Chen, Hai-Feng Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05306145 (A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High Freqnence Irreversible Electroporation and Trans Urethral Resection Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05306145 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of High Freqnence Irreversible Electroporation and Trans Urethral Resection Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai East HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled118ConditionsBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaArmsHigh freqnence Irreversible electroporation, Trans Urethral Resection Prostate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bi-Ming He *Department of Urology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China 190589109@qq.com 446720864@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-7290
Zhen-Kai Shi *Department of Urology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Rui Chen *Department of Urology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Hai-Feng WangDepartment of Urology, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China 190589109@qq.com 446720864@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTransurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard surgical treatment to lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO). Although it has been proven to have substantial efficacy in improving functional outcomes, it has shown a high incidence of complications, including transurethral resection syndrome, massive bleeding, urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) is a novel non-thermal ablation technique that delivers pulsed high-voltage but low-energy electric current to the cell membrane, thereby leading to cell death. H-FIRE has been reported to be tissue-selective, which leads to fewer side effects. However, no data are available on whether H-FIRE is non-inferior compared with TURP in treating patients with LUTS/BPO regarding safety and efficacy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled, double-blinded and non-inferiority study in which all men with LUTS/BPO are included. This study aims to determine whether the HI-FIRE is non-inferior to TURP for achieving better functional outcomes as measured by the co-primary outcome of the change from baseline in maximal flow rate (Q ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. The results of the study will be disseminated and published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05306145.

Indexed as

ElectroporationLower Urinary Tract SymptomsProstatic HyperplasiaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTransurethral Resection of ProstateAgedChinaDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdult urologyProstate diseaseSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID39788775
PMCPMC11751931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.