ArticleBMJ mental health2025
Do coping mechanisms moderate the effect of stressful life events on depression and anxiety in young people? A case-control study from Latin America.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How negative life-events affect sleep quality of college students: a chain-mediating model.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Effects of stressful life events on ART treatment outcomes: a prospective study on the role of individual and personality characteristics and psychological health conditions.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal trends and socio-environmental determinants of suicides in England (2002-2022): an ecological population-based study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStressful life events (SLEs) are associated with increased risk of depression or anxiety. Coping mechanisms may moderate this relationship but little is known on this topic in young people or in Latin America.
aimTo investigate whether coping strategies predict odds of depression and/or anxiety and moderate the relationship between SLEs and depression and/or anxiety in young people in Peru, Lima and Bogotá.
methodUsing case-control data from people aged 15-24, we used logistic regression to examine associations between coping mechanism, SLEs and caseness for depression or anxiety, adjusting for sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors. We included interaction terms to model whether this association varied depending on coping mechanisms (positive cognitive restructuring, problem focused, support seeking, distraction, avoidant).
resultsWe included 1437 cases and 965 controls. Cases reported less use of positive cognitive restructuring (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.75) and problem-focused coping (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93), and more use of avoidance than controls (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.50) in adjusted models. They had greater odds of reporting lifetime (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.10) and past-year (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10) SLEs than controls. We found weak but consistent evidence of effect modification; the association between lifetime SLEs and case-control status was stronger in those who used less support seeking (p=0.09), problem-focused coping (p=0.08) or positive cognitive restructuring (p=0.09).
conclusionsRelationships between SLEs, coping mechanisms and depression/anxiety appear similar in these Latin American cities to other contexts. Active coping strategies may ameliorate the impact of SLEs on mental health of young people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.