Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39788629›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025

The "Outline Sign": Thin Hyperenhancing Perimeter as an MR Imaging Feature of Meningioma. A Useful Tool in the Temporal Bone Region for Differentiating Meningiomas from Schwannomas and Paragangliomas.

Anil K Vasireddi, Katherine L Reinshagen, Donghoon Shin, Laura V Romo, Amy F Juliano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anil K VasireddiFrom the Department of Radiology (A.K.V., D.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0003-7519-4831
Katherine L ReinshagenDepartment of Radiology (K.L.R, L.V.R., A.F.J.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-3705-1082
Donghoon ShinFrom the Department of Radiology (A.K.V., D.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura V RomoDepartment of Radiology (K.L.R, L.V.R., A.F.J.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4539-371X
Amy F JulianoDepartment of Radiology (K.L.R, L.V.R., A.F.J.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts amy_juliano@meei.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5088-5367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThis study investigates the practicality and utility of the "outline sign," which refers to the thin curvilinear hyperenhancing line that may be seen along the margin of a meningioma on a spin-echo postcontrast T1-weighted image. For cases in which the differential diagnosis may include other tumors, visualization of the outline sign may help to increase the diagnostic confidence for a meningioma. Therefore, in the temporal bone region such as the cerebellopontine angle or jugular foramen, where differential considerations may include a schwannoma or paraganglioma, we additionally investigated whether the outline sign may be observed in these nonmeningioma lesions. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 39 clinical MRIs of meningiomas, schwannomas, and paragangliomas with confirmed histopathologic data were studied retrospectively. Two experienced head and neck radiologists independently assessed for the presence or absence of an outline sign and subsequently formed a consensus opinion while blinded to patient information and histopathologic data. Interreader reliability was assessed by Cohen κ statistics. Simple bivariate comparisons were performed on the consensus opinions to assess for statistical differences in presence of the sign in meningiomas versus schwannomas and paragangliomas. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the sign with respect to identifying an underlying meningioma were calculated.

resultsBoth readers displayed identical opinions in assessment of the outline sign in 34 of the 39 cases (87%), including 13 of the 14 meningiomas (93%), with substantial agreement (Cohen κ of 0.74). The outline sign was present in 12 of 14 meningiomas (86%), which was significantly greater in frequency compared with schwannomas (3 of 22, 14%) and paragangliomas (1 of 3, 33%). The outline sign demonstrated high sensitivity (86%), specificity (84%), and accuracy (85%) in identifying an underlying meningioma.

conclusionsThe outline sign can serve as a useful tool for diagnosing meningiomas. It may help distinguish meningiomas from other enhancing tumors, for example schwannomas and paragangliomas in the temporal bone region.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeurilemmomaParagangliomaTemporal BoneAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39788629
PMCPMC11878966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.