ArticleBJGP open2025
Core functions of primary care in Amathole District, South Africa: a descriptive study.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How to measure the core functions of primary care in low-income and middle-income country settings.BMJ global health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStrengthening primary care is a priority globally and for the South African health system. The current measurement tools in South Africa do not assess the core functions of primary care: first contact access, comprehensiveness, coordination, continuity, and person-centredness. A regional version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) has recently been validated and can measure these core functions.
aimTo field test the regional PCAT and measure the core functions of primary care performance. DESIGN &
settingA descriptive cross-sectional survey in Amathole District, South Africa.
methodData were collected from 386 randomly selected patients from 40 clinics and six subdistricts. Data were collected using the REDCap mobile application and analysed in the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (version 27).
resultsThe median primary care score was 3.3 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.2-3.5) where a score ≥3 was seen as acceptable performance and ≥3.5 as good. Person-centredness, coordination, and utilisation were all scored as good (4.0, IQR 4.0-4.0). Comprehensiveness (3.3, IQR 2.9-3.6) and continuity (3.2, IQR 3.1-3.6) were scored as acceptable. Access to care was scored as poor (1.7, IQR 1.0-2.9). There were significant differences in primary care scores between subdistricts. Patients with a worse health status or chronic condition gave lower scores. The most affluent and the poorest groups also gave lower scores.
conclusionThe district needs to focus on improving access to care as well as some aspects of comprehensiveness, continuity, and coordination. The newly validated regional PCAT can provide the district with novel information for performance management and improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.