ArticleThe clinical teacher2025
The Impact of Organisational Interventions on Student Perceptions of the Learning Environment: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe learning environment (LE) refers to the social interactions, organisational culture and physical spaces that shape learners' perceptions and learning. With numerous efforts to measure and improve it, there is still a lack of clearly identified, evidence-based interventions that impact the LE. Our aims were to design LE interventions and measure their effectiveness using a comparison of student responses on the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (AAMC GQ). APPROACH: Root causes of problems in the LE were identified, and comprehensive interventions were then put in place. Interventions addressed three main categories where problems were identified as follows: faculty development, physician wellness, and the learning climate committee. To evaluate changes postintervention, we utilised a repeated cross-sectional design. EVALUATION: Deidentified item-level response data were analysed and organised as a pre-intervention period (2016-2018) and postintervention period (2021-2023). None of the mistreatment events were statistically significant between the periods, except for "required to perform personal services". However, perceptions of faculty professionalism improved significantly in the postintervention period for all questions except the hidden curriculum (HC). IMPLICATIONS: Taken together, our results show that large-scale interventions may be effective at improving perceptions of faculty professionalism but have limited effect on frequency of mistreatment events. The hidden curriculum failed to show improvement with our interventions and has been identified as an area of further research and ongoing interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.