Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39788114›Full record

ArticleEncephalitis (Seoul, Korea)2025

Prognostic factors of subacute comprehensive encephalitis: a retrospective study.

Hiroshi Kataoka, Hitoki Nanaura, Kazuma Sugie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Encephalitis (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hiroshi KataokaDepartment of Neurology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Hitoki NanauraDepartment of Neurology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Kazuma SugieDepartment of Neurology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The etiology of encephalitis is unknown in 40%-50% of cases, so a comprehensive examination of encephalitis would be significant and meaningful. The short-term outcomes in appropriately managed patients are also unknown. Short-term clinical outcomes following onset can provide clinicians with clues regarding the clinical course in the immediate future. We investigated cases of encephalitis, including viral and autoimmune encephalitis, to determine the predictable risk factors that can be assessed to determine a short-term prognosis. Methods: We studied 90 patients with encephalitis. Poor and good outcomes were defined as scores of ≥3 and ≤2 on the modified Rankin scale, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using 19 independent variables was performed. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions (odds ratio [OR], 3.119; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.166-8.344; p = 0.023) and the need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 4.461; 95% CI, 1.685-11.813; p = 0.003)) as being significantly associated with poor outcomes. In 57 patients with subacute encephalitis presenting with cranial MRI lesions, bilateral lesions on cranial MRI (OR, 5.078; 95% CI, 1.516-17.007; p = 0.008) and the need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 4.461; 95% CI, 1.135-13.584; p = 0.031) were significantly associated with poor outcomes. Conclusion: The location of brain lesions, lateral or bilateral, on the initial MRI during the acute phase of encephalitis may be a useful predictor of the outcome during the first 2 months after encephalitis onset, even in cases of encephalitis of unknown etiology.

Indexed as

EncephalitisMagnetic resonance imagingMechanical ventilationOutcomePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39788114
PMCPMC11732267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.